Skip to content
Effective

430 ILCS 65:
Firearm Owners Identification Card Act Overview

FOIDISP

The Firearm Owners Identification Card Act, codified at 430 ILCS 65, establishes this requirement and places administration under the Illinois State Police (ISP) Firearms Services Bureau.[1]

History and Purpose

Originally enacted in 1967 and effective in 1968, the FOID Act established a licensing system for firearm possession. The law was created to establish a standardized identification system that enables the state to screen individuals before they acquire firearms or ammunition. Over the decades, the Act has been amended numerous times to expand disqualifying criteria, modernize the application process, and integrate with federal databases.[2]

Core Requirement

Under 430 ILCS 65/2, no person may acquire or possess any firearm, stun gun, taser, or firearm ammunition within Illinois without possessing a valid FOID card issued by the Illinois State Police.[1] This requirement applies to all types of firearms, including handguns, rifles and shotguns, as well as all ammunition. Illinois residents must have a currently valid FOID card and meet the FOID eligibility requirements when applying for a Concealed Carry License (CCL).

The requirement carries statutory exemptions. Under 430 ILCS 65/2(b), exemptions include nonresidents whose firearms are unloaded and enclosed in a case and nonresidents currently licensed or registered to possess a firearm in their resident state. Nonresidents on an ISP-recognized firing or shooting range are exempt while there and must otherwise keep their firearms unloaded and enclosed in a case. An otherwise FOID-eligible person is also exempt while under the direct supervision of a FOID holder who is at least 21 years old on a firing or shooting range or in a firearms safety and training course recognized by a law enforcement agency or a national or statewide shooting sports organization.

Administering Agency

The ISP Firearms Services Bureau is the sole state agency responsible for processing FOID card applications, renewals, revocations, and suspensions. The Bureau determines the eligibility of all applicants by searching criminal history records, FBI/NICS databases, and Illinois Department of Human Services files relating to mental health and developmental disabilities.[3]

Card Validity and Fees

A FOID card is generally valid for 10 years from issuance, subject to statutory renewal and extension provisions and to suspension or revocation. The application fee is $10, all of which is deposited in the State Police Firearm Services Fund (430 ILCS 65/5(a)). Applicants who are active duty members of the Armed Forces of the United States, members of the Illinois National Guard, or members of the Reserve Forces of the United States are exempt from the application fee. Public Act 104-131 consolidated the former split into a single fund effective September 1, 2026. Additional processing fees may apply depending on the payment method used during the electronic application process.[2]

Scope of the Act

The FOID Act governs far more than initial card issuance. It establishes the criteria for eligibility and disqualification, sets processing timelines, defines the revocation and suspension process, creates the framework for automatic renewal through fingerprint submission, and prescribes penalties for violations. The Act interacts with other Illinois firearms statutes, including the Firearm Concealed Carry Act (430 ILCS 66) and the Protect Illinois Communities Act (Public Act 102-1116), which amended several FOID provisions when it took effect in 2023.[4]

Electronic Application Portal

FOID card applications can be submitted electronically through the ISP Firearms Services Bureau portal at ispfsb.com. Paper applications are accepted only from applicants with appropriate proof that they cannot apply online or at a customer service kiosk because of a religious exemption or a disability. The portal also allows cardholders to check their application status, submit renewals, and update personal information.[2]

Pending Constitutional Challenge

The FOID Act is the subject of a live federal constitutional challenge. On May 19, 2026, three Illinois residents represented by the New Civil Liberties Alliance filed Laurent v. Kelly in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, arguing that the FOID card requirement violates the Second Amendment and the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The named defendants include Illinois State Police Director Brendan F. Kelly, Attorney General Kwame Raoul, and the Cook County State's Attorney. The defendants answered the complaint on July 13, 2026, fact discovery is scheduled to close on February 1, 2027, no ruling on the merits has been issued, and the FOID Act remains in effect.[5]

Verification

6 of 6 factual claims on this page were matched to their source text as of 2026-10-15.

Show the claims
Factual claims on this page and their verification status
ClaimTypeStatusSourceChecked
430 ILCS 65/2Source text: # § 65/2 Firearm Owner's Identification Card required; exceptions (a) (1) No person may acquire or possess any firearm, stun gun, or taser within this State wiSTATverified against sourceNone2026-10-15
430 ILCS 65/2(b)Source text: # § 65/2 Firearm Owner's Identification Card required; exceptions (a) (1) No person may acquire or possess any firearm, stun gun, or taser within this State wiSTATverified against sourceNone2026-10-15
430 ILCS 65/5(a)Source text: # § 65/5 Application and renewal (a) The Illinois State Police shall either approve or deny all applications within 30 days from the date they are received, exSTATverified against sourceNone2026-10-15
Public Act 104-131Source text: # Public Act 104-0131 Public Act 104-0131 SB2002 EnrolledLRB104 03188 RTM 13209 b AN ACT concerning finance. Be it enacted by the People of the State of IllSESSION_LAWverified against sourceNone2026-10-15
Public Act 102-1116Source text: # Public Act 102-1116 Public Act 102-1116 HB5471 EnrolledLRB102 24372 BMS 33606 b AN ACT concerning regulation. Be it enacted by the People of the State of SESSION_LAWverified against sourceNone2026-10-15
Laurent v. KellySource text: Laurent v. Kelly (1:26-cv-05790)CASEverified against sourceNone2026-10-15